Category: blog

  • Home Again

    We are returned from the wilds of Wisconsin.

    In the last post I mentioned we were attending MadCon 2010 in Madison, touted as the last convention Harlan Ellison will ever do.  Much speculation runs rampant over the internet about this and his own presentations at the convention will doubtless throw gasoline on the inferno.  Having spent more than a small amount of time in his company this past weekend, I will report only that the rumors are pretty much exactly that.  Those who know him, know what’s more or less going on, and those who don’t, unless they were present at MadCon and heard what he had to say, do not know what is going on, and after a few conversations with the man I will not post about it here.

    I will say that he holds the most desolate of opinions about the internet possible without becoming a complete luddite (which he is not).

    We sat at the banquet table Saturday night with Gene Wolfe and his wife and a nicer man would be hard to find.  I’ve always liked Gene, have had too few opportunities to talk with him, and this past weekend I got to sit on two panels with him.

    Likewise with my good friend Allen Steele.  We have been at several conventions together over the years and always manage to not be on panels together.  Admittedly, some of this has to do with our slightly divergent interests in certain aspects of SF, but not entirely, so this weekend made up for a long-running deficit.

    We also met new people—a shout out to Pat Rothfuss, Tim Richmond, Rich Keeny, John Klima (of Electric Velocipede), Maggie Thompson, Nayad Monroe, Mark Rich, and others.  It was a quality weekend.  I have a huge load of work to do this week before Archon this coming weekend, but having had this occasion and first-rate block of time with Donna, I can tackle it all handily.

    There will be many reports (and “reports”) about what occurred at MadCon.  All I will say about it here is this:  it was one of those “you had to be there” events.  Otherwise, only your prejudices will be tickled—scatology will reign where truth is absent.  But then, that seems to be the way it always goes when it comes to Harlan.

  • On The Road

    Tomorrow morning, probably before the sun is up, we will be on the road to Madison, Wisconsin.  We’re going to attend a little convention called MadCon 2010.  When you click on the link you will see a note explaining that the guest of honor, Harlan Ellison, will not, due to illness, make it.  Well, that’s changed, apparently.  Harlan says he is feeling up to it and will be getting on a plane tomorrow and will appear.

    Last time we saw Harlan was in 1999, at a convention called Readercon (which is a genuinely spiffy excellent convention because it is ALL ABOUT BOOKS—no movies, no anime, no costumes, none of that, just BOOKS) and he was in great form and we had a marvelous time.

    By a series of odd coincidences, about two years ago, I became better acquainted with Harlan.  We’ve spoken on the phone and written to each other a few times and while it would be the height of hubris for me to claim that we are friends, we are at least on first name friendly terms.  (It’s funny how, with certain people, sometimes you seem to have to “save up” stuff to talk about before calling them, because what you very much want not to do is bore them.  I’ve never quite known how to recognize the point past which that concern no longer matters.)  I wrote a piece about the documentary, Dreams With Sharp Teeth, both for this blog and cross-posted to Dangerous Intersection.  I was impressed with the film and have always been impressed by its subject, so I took a few minutes to alert others to its existence.

    Much to my dismay, Harlan got word to me that he had seen it and wanted to thank me personally.  I called him, we talked, we’ve conversed on occasion since.  I’ve been looking forward to this trip for over a year.

    Naturally, when word came down that he might not make it, we were bummed, but still intent on going.  The news today is heartening, to say the least.  I will write about it when I get back.

    I’m doing some panels at the convention, a couple of them with a good friend, Allen Steele, with whom I’ve done far too few panels since we met way back in the early 90s.  Others will be there that I look forward to seeing again or meeting for the first time.  (The estimable and excellent Gene Wolfe will be there.)  But even so, I’m going as a fan.  Harlan’s work has meant a very great deal to me.  He is unique.  Worth a read, to be sure.

    So till next week sometime…adieu.

  • Didn’t They Throw The Tea In The Harbor…?

    Christine O’Donnell is one of those public figures that emerge from time to time that make any writer of fiction envious of reality.  Only a truly gifted writer could make someone like this up and then sell her as a plausible character.

    At the heart of it, she is the problem with the Tea Party.

    Here’s the thing I’ve never understood about the far right: fiscal responsibility is well and good and certainly we could do with a lot more—we could have used some for the last thirty years, certainly, a period during which Republicans (and by inference conservatives) have been largely in control of Congress—but how come is it we can’t seem to get candidates who are just about that without dragging all the social issue crap along with them?  I for one am tiring of having my alternatives clipped because some whack-a-do who may well have a sound fiscal policy in mind is also hell bent on “correcting” the lax, immoral, godless state of the country.

    Now we get right down to the basic issues with Ms. O’Donnell: jacking off.  It’s destroying the country.  People are going blind from this, divorce rates are record high because selfish people are doing themselves at the expense of the shared relationship god intended they have.  Abstinence means all of it!  Tie those peoples’ hands behind their backs!  Put those genital safety belts on those young fellows who can’t leave johnny alone!  Why, if we root out the evil of self-pleasuring, we’ll be on the road to sound financial policy and security in no time!

    Then of course there’s the usual slate of absurdities—she’s a young earth creationist.  (What, may I ask, does this have to do with fiscal conservatism?  Well, in her case, apparently, a difficulty with basic math…)  Naturally she opposes abortion and since she’s so down on pud pounding, we may presume she hasn’t much use for birth control of any kind, sex education, or possible female orgasm.

    She is that perfect contradiction of modern far right womanhood—someone who probably thinks women’s place is in the home who is attempting to establish a powerful political career in order to legislate herself back into a state of chattel bondage.

    And then there’s the Libertarian wing of the Tea Party that basically believes people ought to be free to choose their own lives without interference from anyone, especially the government, and eventually they will create the fissure in opposition to the Talibaptist contingent who want more than anything to tell people how to live decent lives.

    It may do this country good to elect some of these folks into public office so we can see, really see how they perform.  How they make their philosophies mesh with what most Americans really want.

    It’s a sad time for American politics.  We’re in a depression (why they insist on continuing to call it a recession is purist political cynicism), Obama has not miraculously fixed that, and people are pissed off.  They are in a “Throw the bastards out” mood, but unfortunately they have little to choose from.  The Republican Party, self-deluded that they may ride this tide back into power for “all the right reasons”, has so bankrupted its credibility right before, during, and since W that even conservatives must hold their noses to vote for them.  The Democrats have failed once again to define an American Ideology behind which the people can get and although right now they are probably on the right track fiscally, it will take time for their actions to result in anything fruitful.  (Didn’t Obama say all along it would take a long time?  Didn’t he say this would not be painless?  Didn’t he say a lot of work would have to be done before things started drifting back to something good?  Didn’t he?  But he’s been in office 19 months!  My god, just how long is a long time?)  They haven’t “fixed things” so people don’t like them either.

    So there’s the Tea Party.  This is bottom of the barrel time.  These are the screeling, apocalyptic, neo-revisionist, founding-principled-though-illiterate gang of conspiracy theorist candidates who have gained momentum through sheer quality of nerve, who intend to save the country from our foreign-born Muslim president and the anarcho-socialist intellectual elite.  They are the ones who wish to remove all the interfering laws and restrictions that hamper the marrow-deep entrepreneurial American essence and allow people to make millions on their own or starve in the gutter with their families because while Darwin was wrong about biology he was right about economic policy and the weak ought to perish so the strong can dominate.  These are the folks who would free us to be dominated by Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Banking, and Big Insurance.  These are people who believe corporations are people, too, and back the American dream nurtured in the heart of every kid who wants to grow up to be a corporation.  Or an oligarch.

    But first, they have to curtail masturbation.  The country has had enough of people jacking off.  Time to get them back to work.

  • A Week’s Worth of Stuff

    This past week some things have moved forward which please me.  The Missouri Center for the Book is about it have a new Facebook page.  I made the decision to put it up now, in advance of the total website make-over, because I think it will be necessary to get the upcoming Celebration promoted more efficiently.  That event will be October 23rd, again in Columbia.  Barring other avenues of advertising, I think this one will be essential.

    It’s happening.  Also, the new website design is coming along quickly and when that is up there will be regular blog posts, and a special section from the state poet laureate.  When that happens, obviously, I’ll post about it here.

    On a personal front, I’ve gotten the preliminary schedule from Context in Columbus OH and they’ve put me on at least three panels and given me a kaffeeklatsch.  The latter will be interesting.  I’ve done a couple of these, but with less than amazing results.  One of these days I hope to have a dozen people show up and make me feel like a real honest-to-goodness writer type person.  But the panels look interesting.

    More short fiction.  I am forcing the hindbrain to put out.  I will do more short stories.  I’m coming to grips with an old one that almost didn’t work but now seems to be moving along nicely.

    I went to the gym Friday and had a decent work-out (650 lbs on the leg press, not too shabby for an old man) but I’m feeling a bit drained today, so I’m putting off going back till tomorrow or Tuesday.

    Although many things are still in limbo, curiously I’ve been feeling good about things this past week, like everything will work out fine.  I am not given to groundless optimism or airy prognostications.  “Oh, it will all come out fine, you’ll see,” is not a working philosophy for me.  But you can only control so much on your own.  You can do the best you can with what you have in hand and if the next step depends on Other People, well, you can’t let their lethargy, inertia, or recalcitrance depress you.  It does depress you, because, well, if they don’t do X, Y, or Z then what you want to do doesn’t move forward, but there’s not much you can do about that short of going to them personally and being persuasive.  Like that would work.

    So you shift gears and work on something else.  You enjoy a good meal.  Watch a movie, read a book, contemplate the heavens…

    cloud.jpg

    In my case, the physical heavens, as the supernatural variety holds no charm for me.

    Having said that, I note that Christopher Hitchens, earnest, sharp, intellectually stimulating transplanted Brit who lectures and debates on atheism among other things, is in dire straits.  He was diagnosed recently with esophageal cancer, a nasty form that has a low survival rate.  His father apparently died of it.  I saw him recently on an interview with Anderson Cooper and most of his hair is already gone from the chemo, but he was quite stoic and lucid.  He was asked about the possibility of a death-bed conversion and he said emphatically that as long as he was himself, no, but there’s no guarantee that he won’t be someone else if he’s too far gone in pain and medication.

    Life is what it is.  I know intellectually that it isn’t fair.  It isn’t anything pro or con in terms of justice or equality or anything else.  It is what it is.  Fairness is a concept of our invention that we bring to the enterprise.  But because it’s ours, we tend to invest it with merit and get angry when things don’t go according to an expectation we impose.

    Still, I wish him well and will regret his death.  He fearlessly pokes into the dark corners and writes about what he finds and people like that are worth more than can be assessed.

    Another mixed bag of a week, then.  Can’t wait to see what next week has in store.

  • Interview Complete

    Over on Dangerous Intersection, all of my interview has been posted.  It’s up in three separate posts, seven parts altogether.  The links to each post are here:

    http://dangerousintersection.org/2010/07/18/mark-tiedemann-speaks/

    http://dangerousintersection.org/2010/07/19/mark-tiedemann-interview-parts-iv-and-v/

     http://dangerousintersection.org/2010/07/21/mark-tiedemann-wraps-up/

    Watching them now leaves me with mixed feelings.  This was almost a year-and-a-half ago.  The entire thing was done in the most casual way.  Erich had a few primer questions and then he just let me ramble.  There are bits I’d say differently now, but in essence not much would I change.  A couple of points are less clear than I’d like—the question about whether we are a “christian nation” is not answered as well as I would have preferred (Are we a christian nation?  No.  Are we a nation of christians?  Largely.  I wanted to make it clear that the secular nature of what the Founders established is so for a very, very good reason) but I think the idea gets across.

    This is eerie in many ways.  It’s like watching someone else who happens to look and sound like me and, yeah, I agree with the guy.

    Anyway, I am very happy to have been given the chance to do this.  I hope people who check them out are entertained if nothing else.

  • A Moment of Celebrity Type Stuff

    A friend of mine, the estimable Erich Veith, came by my home a bit over a year ago and we recorded a long interview.  Erich has finally gotten around to editing it and has begun posting segments on YouTube.  Here’s the first one.  (I still haven’t figured out how to embed videos here, so bear with me.)

    Erich runs the website  Dangerous Intersection, where I post opinionated blatherings from time to time and Erich graciously allows me to hold forth in my own idiosyncratic manner.  Why he thought people would also enjoy watching and hearing me as well, I can’t say, but I enjoyed the process and from the looks of the first three (which are up at Dangerous Intersection) I don’t think I came off too badly.

    The one thing that has puzzled me about Erich these past few years is, where does he find the time to do what he does?  I mean, he’s a lawyer, for one thing.  He has two daughters his wife and he are raising.  He’s a musician who occasionally gigs.  And he runs this website, which is quite large and has a lot of traffic, and would seem to me to be just a lot of damn work.  If you haven’t spent some time there, do.  In my experience it’s unique and I’ve enjoyed being a small part of it.

    My thanks to Erich for the opportunity to play at celebrity just a wee bit.  I hope others enjoy the results.

  • Mel Gibson and Other Musings

    So Mel Gibson has been exposed (once again) as an intolerant, sexist, abusive person.  A recording of a phone conversation with his former girlfriend is now Out There on the internet and one can listen to Mel spill molten verbiage into her earpiece while she calmly refutes his charges.

    All I can wonder is,  So what?

    What business is this of ours?  This is private stuff.  People lose control.  Between each other, with strangers, but more often with those closest, people have moments when the mouth ill-advisedly opens and vileness falls out.  The question is, does this define us?  Are we, in fact, only to be defined by our worst moments?

    That would seem to be the case for people like Gibson.  The reason, I think, is that for most of us, the Mel Gibsons of the world have no business having shitty days and acting like this.  For most of us, there is just cause for having these kinds of days and attitudes, because for most of us the world is not our oyster and we do not have the luxury of squandering time, friends, and money.  Mel Gibson is wealthy and famous and, at one time, admired.  He ate at the best restaurants, appeared on television, gave interviews, has his picture on the covers of magazines.  Is seen with other people, regularly, who fall into that category of Those Who Have It Made.

    They aren’t supposed to have bad days.  They aren’t supposed to be shitty to their lovers.  They aren’t supposed to act like people who are desperate, down on their luck, and bitterly outraged at the world.

    The question, though, is, do people who are down on their luck and bitter with their (admittedly pathetic) lot in life act that way?  How would we know?  Joe Asfalt doesn’t get interviewed by People or Us and when he has a falling out with his girlfriend the tabloids do not follow him or them around, looking for a scoop on their latest battle.  When Joe or his girl toss each other out of the house, no one is watching except the neighbors.  So how do we know how they behave?

    Maybe we assume they behave that way and it gives pleasure to see Mel Gibson being a jerk.  Makes him “one of us.”  Except he isn’t.

    But I don’t really give a damn about the private uglinesses of either Joe Asfalt or Mel Gibson.  It only matters to me when their private shittiness emerges into a public display, as in the case of Tom Cruise’s  asinine, Scientology-driven jeremiads about post-partum depression.  That matters because he is Tom Cruise and, like it or not, people put stock in what he says, and that incident had impact on peoples’ lives, not the least of which was Brooke Shields.  If Mel Gibson went berserk during an interview and made pronouncements about “the proper attire, place, position, and attitude” of women, then I’d care about what he thinks and says, because that would have consequences.

    What is unfortunate is that such things affect how we view their work.  It’s not fair, really.  People run the gamut, from really wonderful to really awful, and some of those people are artists.  Some of those artists are really good and create wonderful things, even those artists who may otherwise be reprehensible human beings.  In this regard I can understand the attitude of someone like J.D. Salinger or Thomas Pynchon, who have done all they could to keep people out of their private lives.  They given almost no interviews, they never made a big deal about themselves in public, eschewing the limelight.  In the case of someone like Salinger, the hermit approach actually contributed to his celebrity, fueling further book sales, because it becomes part of the myth about him.  It would not matter if he had done what he did with exactly that in mind, it would have happened anyway.  Pynchon less so, perhaps.

    But I can respect the idea that this was done precisely so the work wasn’t colored by the personality of the artist in ways that have nothing to do with the work.

    Society at large has a hunger for the viscera of the artist.  People who may never see a film, read a book, listen to a record with any genuine appreciation for the content of the work will nevertheless pay attention to those things in direct proportion to how much celebrity is attached to the artist.  So much so that we have phenomena like Paris Hilton who is famous for being famous.

    I’ve been mulling these ideas over lately because of the reverse question—how well does any artist know his or her audience?

    And do they want to?

    Demographics seem to drive everything today.  Targeting your audience correctly is the holy grail of promotions.  Is that movie geared toward the 18-to-24 crowd?  Women more than men?  What income bracket?  Education?  In the case of books, this leads me to ask, if they are in “my” demographic target, does that mean they will buy my books because they are predisposed to reading them, or is something much less causally connected, like those people who actually read who are part of that demographic may be more likely to buy my books than people who read who are part of some other demographic…

    But what is it about those other demographics that precludes the likelihood that they’ll buy my book?  That they’d more likely buy some other author’s books, based on the perception that he or she writes for the 25-to-45 upper middle class crowd.

    Pondering this makes my brain hurt.  Of all the factors that contribute to defining a demographic likely to do A rather than B or C, which factors contribute to a strong likelihood that none of them will fit the demographic that will pay attention to your work.

    And if some of those factors have to do with your public persona, then you have to ask which part?  The part that no one is ever supposed to know anything about (like a private phone call to a soon-to-be-ex-lover) or the part that you might tailor exclusively for public consumption.  In which case, isn’t that as much a work of art as the work of art you’re trying to sell?

    But at the end of the day, I’m still left wondering just why anyone is really interested in someone’s private life they do not know.  Not, mind you, in the sense of being disinterested in biography as history—the private labyrinths of a Howard Hughes become, over time, fascinating because of the archaeological nature of examining his legacy—but in the sense of trying to find a one-to-one relevance between you and a celebrity.  In that sense, it becomes legitimate to ask what purpose was served by the years of public attention to some like Wynona Judd and her seeming inability to have a happy life.  The feedback loop between personal tragedy, public perception-reception, and attempted “managing” of the personal in order to accommodate a publicity machine creates an ongoing kind of performance art that eventually has less to do with authentic experience and more to do with Artist As Subject, and therefore becomes increasingly artificial, at least in presentation, regardless of any reality—a reality which, under pressure from the attention, retreats further from the limelight and takes on further burdens in the attempt to be private.  You could see the whole thing as a kind of therapy conducted on the couch of public opinion, but to what benefit?  The thing receiving the therapy becomes less the person than the image.

    And then who is being served?  Is this merely entertainment or is there in fact a public function in all this closet-revelation?

    One thinks of politicians immediately, in particular with respect to sexual impropriety.  Do the private practices of an individual have anything to do with his or her ability to do a particular job?

    I suppose it’s a matter of what job they are required to do.  A senator whose campaign, election, and office concerned fiscal responsibility and who by any measure performs this task competently if not excellently is revealed to keep a mistress or two.  What does the one have to do with the other?  Nothing, really.  Private pecadilloes matter when the impropriety is directly connected with the job—for instance, if said senator had a history of insider trading or embezzlement.

    But then those would not be private, would they?  They would involved public factors.  Not sex, but monetary impropriety, even if kept private (and how could it be unless we’re talking about a loan from a brother-in-law that was never repaid?), has a direct public impact.

    Another senator whose campaign, election, and subsequent legislation bear on families, divorce laws, obscenity laws, laws governing the dissemination of birth control or the availability of abortion services or even information about birth control and abortion, or perhaps support of a foreign regime in which women are oppressed, then turns out to be cheating on his wife or has a history of using prostitutes.  Well, that bears directly, doesn’t it?  The hypocrisy of a Family Values politician keeping mistresses certainly is relevant to public policy.

    As unlikely as it might be that such a politician would be elected, someone who declared openly that he or she has had and may continue to have partners before, during, and outside of marriage would not, in my opinion, raise a question of moral conflict under these circumstances.  We could vote for or against from the beginning, there would be no deception.  Likewise with the politician who had exercised “poor judgment” in fiscal matters.

    But the complicating factor in such instances would be how the private matters were disclosed.  This hinges on the question of whether or not a person can and does change over time.  The recently deceased Senator Byrd’s past affiliation with the KKK is an example.  Given the opportunity and time, he demonstrated that, at least in the performance of his office, that circumstance had been left in the past.  Whether he had truly changed in his sentiments is beside the point next to his subsequent public record.

    What all this has to do with Mel Gibson is relevant only in the question of when and how the revelation of private failings is legitimate.  Does the knowledge that Mel Gibson can be a foul-mouthed, abusive, sexist racist impact anyone or anything outside his circle of acquaintances?  Because they, presumably, judge him and act accordingly without public input.  Does this kind of “news” serve any function beyond attracting and increasing the kind of attention that sells tabloids?

    Because everyone has a part of themselves they would rather keep exclusively between themselves and their chosen intimates.  Would it be fair if all of us were recorded displaying our less wonderful aspects and having said recording sent, say, to prospective employers or the dating services we might use or our new date or to the shopowners and restaurateurs we frequent or to business associates?  If all their dealings with us to date have been positive, how are they supposed to react if something like that were suddenly dropped into their lap?  And how would we defend ourselves from the predictable reactions?

    I’m just wondering.

  • A Few More Memories

    I thought I’d post a handful of photographs from Clarion ’88.  Just a few.  The temptation to try to do humorous captions is great, but I decided to simply be informative.  Enjoy.

    owen-hall.JPG

    The entrance to Owen Hall, the dorm building
    van-hoosen.JPG

    Van Hoosen, where the workshops were conducted

    tim-powers.JPG

    Tim Powers, our first week writer-in-residence, in session

    pizza-in-van-hoosen.JPG

    Pizza with Powers

    daryls-rp.JPG

    Daryl Gregory, doing his Tim Powers “I Got No Story” Clarion Blues

    kelley-on-crutches.JPG

    Kelley Eskridge arrived already injured, with sprained ankle, but as optimistic as the rest of us

    picnic.JPG

    One of many outdoor meals held in the courtyard of Van Hoosen.  Lisa Goldstein, second week instructor, is in the midst of students here

    beggars-banquet.jpg

    One of the other eateries in East Lansing frequented by Clarionites

    chip.JPG

    Chip Delany, third week instructor

    nicola.JPG

    Nicola Griffith

    workshop-cool.JPG

    Andy Tisbert, Me (attempting inscrutability), and Kimberly Rufer-Bach during a workshop

    kate-stan-damon.JPG

    Kate Wilhelm, Kim Stanley Robinson (fourth week instructor), and Damon Knight.  Kate and Damon were fifth and sixth week

    new-shirts-copy.jpg

    We had our own t-shirts and sweat shirts made, with a logo for our year, and “reading matter” on the back.  This was the day they arrived

    group-story.JPG

    During the last week we wrote a “group story” which blatantly abused all the “rules” we’d learned.  This was it’s one and only performance.  Daryl Gregory, Brooks Caruthers, Me, Lou Grinzo, and Kelley Eskridge

    The quality of the photos may not be the best, but these were done long, long ago, in a galaxy far, far away.  The memories cannot be contained in so few pictures, yet for those of us who were there, they may trigger the infinity of all that we shared.

  • Clarion

    Tomorrow, June 26th, is the 22nd anniversary of my arrival at the Clarion Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Workshop, on the campus of Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.  The following piece was written for an anthology about Clarion several years ago, one which firstly did not take the essay and secondly seems not to have appeared at all.  Be that as it may, I’ve decided to post it here.  Enjoy.

    And to all my fellow Clarionites, Happy Anniversary.

    Baked Grass and Surgical Evisceration

    The room could double for a steambath late into the night.  When we arrived—seventeen of us from Maine to California, plus one from England—the weather was the last thing on our minds.  Now, four weeks into it, ignoring the weather was a consuming pasttime.  East Lansing was a torpid landscape of browning grass, heat mirages, and wilting humans.  Earlier it had been 103; as the sun vanished it left behind an afterwash that, I swear, raised the heat index.

    Owen Hall.  Seventh Floor.  So this is Clarion.

    When I had applied for the workshop it was an act of measured desperation.  I’ve always, in one way or another, wanted to be a writer, but not until 1981 or ’82 had I done anything about it.  Even then it was more a hobby than—well, than the passion it has become.  In the fall of ’87 I filled out the applications, placed my two stories with them into an envelope, and sent them on their way, like a bottle with a note for help cast out to sea.  I had every expectation that this, like most of what I had written in the previous five or six years, would be rejected.  I had solemnly told my companion-best friend-lover Donna that if Clarion did not want me I would give it up.  The writing.  Like a junky I was not at all certain that was possible.  But rejection after rejection adds up and the demand of the Gods Who Edit And Write The Checks seemed unachievable.  I had reached the end of my sanity.  I had no idea why I was unable to write salable work.  I had no idea what I was doing wrong.  I had no idea why my offerings came back unwanted.  If there was one thing I knew clearly about my expectations of Clarion it was that this question be answered.  What was I doing wrong?

    Being accepted to Clarion was not quite as great a relief as a cancer patient being told he is in remision—but I think I have an inkling what that must feel like.

    Now, the heat sapping what energy was left after workshopping and writing, my thoughts drifted toward doubts of a different, though kindred, sort.

    What the hell am I doing here?

    Long distance to Donna (glumly):  “I don’t know what I’m doing here.  There are some incredibly talented people here.  I feel like…I don’t know…I don’t measure up.”

    Donna:  “Do you want to come home?”

    Me:  “I don’t know.  Yeah, maybe.”

    Donna:  “Okay.  Then walk.  And make sure you bring everything with you.”

    I had brought a coffeebrewer, my own coffee, a MacIntosh computer, half a dozen reference books, a tape player and two dozen cassettes, vitamins, and clothes.  Oh, yes, a small portable fan, which in this heat had become a cooling fan for the computer, lest it seize up on me and mightily crimp my progress.

    The white screen of the MacIntosh seemed as daunting as the proverbial blank sheet of paper so many writers have mentioned.  I was supposed to fill that screen.  Hm.

    Clarion was a six week escape.  I had never had, and would probably not have for a long time afterward, so much time to simply write.  I wanted to take advantage of it.  I hyped myself into overdrive whenever the least thread of a story line presented itself to me.  Get it out, get it on the disks, don’t let it get away whatever you do!

    Fourth week.  The story I had finally finished the previous night had come out easily enough, but then I printed it out.  I listened to the insect buzzing of the printer and with each pass of the ribbon felt worse.  Another piece of crap.  Another failed experiment.  It had a beginning, a middle, and an end.  So much for improving.

    I stepped out into the hallway while it printed.  From around the corner at the far end—emerging from the “girl’s hall”, a result of MSU sexual prudery or something (which never made sense because there were regular MSU students of both sexes strewn up and down both corridors, which meant only the Clarion students were segregated…)—Daryl, Andy, and Brooks came advancing toward me, Andy aiming a video camera and Daryl reciting some narrative like a demented Inside Edition reporter.

    Everyone ended up doing a spot for Daryl’s tape, a video documentary of bits of Clarion.  When the excitement had died down and the camera was gone, I went to bed.

    Swelter, swelter.  Listen to heat melt the oxygen in the air.

    In the morning I woke to the gurgling of my coffeemaker.  I looked over the story again, grimaced (there is a word, are we in the sf genre aware? that almost never appears in any other form of fiction, and I have heard solid arguments from english professors why sf will never be significant because we insist on using “grimace”), and stared out at the highrise shimmering across from our building.  It was already too damn hot.

    I read the last story that had to be critiqued that day, made my notes, knocked back some more coffee, and dressed.  I left my cubicle and headed for the back stairs.

    Behind Owen Hall a narrow river, the Red Cedar, runs through the campus.  A forest area sprawls against the river.  There are trails and it is preternaturally quiet and beautiful.  I had gotten into the habit of going this way to Van Hoosen every morning, camera in hand.

    Van Hoosen is a conference hall connected to rows of fairly nice apartments surrounding a grassy courtyard.  The writers-in-residence live in one of these spacious apartments.  They are air conditioned.  We had commented to Al Drake and David Jones, our director and assistant director, that many of these other apartments seemed empty.  It would have been nice to have been allowed to occupy them rather than the monk’s holes on the seventh floor of Owen.

    “Expensive,” David had said.

    “They’re empty,” we replied.

    Van Hoosen was air conditioned.  Mercifully.  I handed my manuscript to David for xeroxing and got another cup of coffee.

    This was week four.  First we’d had Tim Powers; then Lisa Goldstein; Chip Delany; now we had Stan Robinson.  Stan brought with him memories of his Clarion experience, a quietly academic approach, a croquet set, and we were considering blaming him for the heat.

    The workshop was conducted in the round.  Each of us took a turn, rotating clockwise, starting at the given week’s instructor’s left and coming full circle back to him.  After the writer, then Al Drake would add something.  Each of us did what we could to avoid being First.

    workshop-session-copy.jpg

    It’s difficult to describe what goes on at such a workshop.  Stan had congratulated us for not indulging in shotgun/machinegun crits, as, he explained, had happened during his Clarion.  We spoke to the story in hand, examined it technically, almost clinically, and tried to keep our visceral reactions objectifiable.  Sometimes that wasn’t possible.  Sometimes a story was either too good or too bad to be objective about and sometimes that aspect had to be addressed.  But we tended to be—if this is applicable to students—professional about it.  From some of the stories I’ve heard some workshops had been bloodier than a Brian dePalma flick.

    The workshop went until lunchtime.  Then we had time to write.  Or wander the campus.  Or go into town and blow it off.

    I was written out.  I felt dismal about my story.  I mentioned it to Kelley, but I couldn’t explain without telling her the story, and we had all gotten into the habit of not discussing the specifics of our stories before they were written.  I felt by and large out-of-place here.

    I grabbed my cameras and walked down Bogue St. into town.

    Bogue dead-ended at East Grand River Avenue, which borders the campus, separating it from East Lansing proper.  It’s a broad street with islands running down the center, and containing shops, restuarants, message boards with layers of posters and personal notes tacked to them.  One of these boards had caught fire recently; no one had cleaned off the charred remnants and now more messages were being tacked over the blackened tatters.

    I hesitated before Curious Books.  This had become the bookstore of choice for us, not least because the owner, Ray Walsh, had arranged for each of our instructors to do a signing every Wednesday.  It was a wonderful bookstore, crammed with used and new, the air permeated with the heady odor of printed matter.  I’d already spent a small fortune here.  I walked by.

    curious-books.JPG

    I went straight to the Olde World Soup Kitchen.  As far as I had been able to tell I was the only one who had discovered this place.  I adore a good bowl of chicken soup (they make excellent sandwiches, too) and I wasn’t unhappy about being alone.  I could sit and think.

    Some of the things I thought about were facets of Clarion that nobody ever talks about—at least, they didn’t tell me.

    One: you learn just how much you can accomplish on five hours or less a night sleep.

    Two: there are worse things than not being able to write at all—being able only to write garbage.

    Three: you discover just how much alcohol you can take in and still be coherent.  Sort of.

    Four: the workshop structure of Clarion lends true insight in just what an editor must go through daily dealing with the slush pile.

    I had my soup and a sandwich and I thought about these and other things.  No conclusions, just mental exercise.  At this point I wished I could have turned my brain off for awhile.  When I had no more excuses I stepped once again into the blastfurnace and made my roundabout way back to Owen Hall.  As I entered the lobby George was passing through.

    “David’s looking for you,” he said.  “Something about missing a page of your story.”

    “Shit.  Where is he?”

    George had a number jotted down and I called on one of the lobby phones.  David explained that I was shy the last page of my story, could I get him another and run it over to him?

    What else was I supposed to say?  No, David, let everyone read the damn thing and guess the ending.  I ran up the stairs—the elevators took too damn long—sprinted to my room and booted up the story.  I printed out the last page, closed everything down, and bolted for the stairs again.  The copy room for our use was two buildings away.  I ran.

    When I entered the building I encountered a large group of Asian exchange students, all talking animatedly in their own tongue.  I strode through them, silent, out-of-breath, and sweating profusely, a lone sheet of paper in my hand, and somehow did not seem to attract their attention.

    David was in the basement.  His eyes widened slightly when I entered the copy room.

    “Here,” I said, handing over the page.

    “Thanks.  I’m sorry about this.”

    “No problem.  My fault.  But I don’t understand how one page could’ve gotten lost.”  I glanced at the pile of copies he’d been running.  We had a lot to read tonight.  At least I didn’t have to go through my own story again.

    “Well, yours was the last one in the stack and I’d gotten all the rest copied, then I couldn’t find the last page.”  He scratched his head.  “I’m glad George found you.”

    I opened the copier lid.  A sheet of paper lay there.  I picked it up.  We both stared at it.  My original last page.  David winced.

    “Sorry.”

    I didn’t mind too much.  This building had fully functional air conditioning.

    When he finished, I walked with him back to Owen, talking about various things that didn’t require a lot of thought.  David slid the copied stories under the door of each room containing a Clarionite.  As I watched each copy of my effort disappear under each door I felt worse by degrees.

    We parted at my room and I locked the door behind me.  The small, rather noisy refrigerator I’d gotten from management contained a couple of six-packs of wine coolers.  I stripped, showered, and sat staring out the window, downing one after another.  In the middle of the third one I started reading the small pile of stories.

    I’m a slow reader.  I was worried about that when I came and found out what the schedule was.  I had to read all these tonight, critique them, and be ready to be constructive in the morning.  As long as the stories were short I had no trouble, but once in awhile someone—like Daryl—would dump a novelette or novella on us, hence a night that basically allowed me about three and a half hours’ sleep.  Tonight there were four stories, including mine.  Well, I didn’t have to read mine.  One of the others was about nine thousand words.  I read that first.

    It was dark by the time I finished the other two.

    I was on my fifth cooler.

    Instead of trying to sleep in the sauna of my room, I decided to go down to Stan’s room to soak up some atmosphere—cooled atmosphere.

    (I’m also not a party sort.  I tend to be horribly shy in groups larger than two, so I hadn’t attended very many late night bashes with instructors.  To be fair, there hadn’t been many till Stan’s week.)

    When I arrived at his room, my head nicely encased in cotton from the coolers, things were quiet.  Stan was holding forth about his Clarion.  Andy was there.  Sharon and Glenda, too.  I had no idea what time it was.  I helped myself to a glass of white wine and sat and listened.

    “—no, we weren’t even here,” he was saying.  “We over in ____ Hall.  The workshop room was in the same building.”

    The air was nice.  I sort of nodded off.

    “Wanna go for a walk?”

    I looked up.  Andy was standing before me.  “Hmm?”

    “We’re going for a walk with Stan,” he said.

    “Where?”

    “Over by his old hall.”

    I glanced at my watch.  It was nearly midnight.  I was tempted to stay in the room and enjoy the air, but what the hell?  I had missed a lot of this sort of thing so far (I thought) so I shrugged and stood.

    It had actually cooled down somewhat.  The night air was maybe ninety degrees?  The grass crackled sadly underfoot, like we were walking on small snack crackers.

    The stars were brilliant, though.

    Stan spoke in semi-reverent tones about water fights, group readings, the horrible cafeteria food, tristes, trials, and travesties.  I thought, my what a placcid, boring group we are compared to his.  (Later I asked Damon about that and he opined that the 88 Clarion class was an older median age than the others, older enough that we didn’t—well, behave younger.)

    We arrived at a gothic manse of a building that hulked in the night like a troll’s mound.

    “This is it,” Stan announced and bounded up the front steps.  He grabbed hold of the door handle and pulled.  The doors rattled.  “It’s locked…”  He tried the other doors.  “What time is it?”

    “Twelve ten,” I said.  I stood next to Andy, hands in my pockets like a tourist, watching Stan go from door to door, peer through his framed hands into the dimly-lit interior, grow visibly disappointed.

    “I guess they lock up at midnight,” he said.  “Well, my room was over here.”  He crossed the law (crackle, crackle, crackle) to a row of windows that looked into the basement.  He started searching.  “Damn.  They aren’t dorm rooms anymore.  They look like store rooms.”

    I walked up beside him and looked in.  Boxes, old desks, unmarked rolls of something (maybe maps) filled the rooms.  Stan went to the next, then the next.

    “I don’t remember which it is,” he said.

    “Let’s try the back door,” Sharon suggested.

    I nodded and followed Glenda and her to the rear parking lot.  The doors were all locked.  Stan and Andy came around then, Stan talking once more about his days at Clarion.  I told him none of the doors were open and he gave the building a sort of wistful look.

    “Oh, hell,” I said, pulling my pocket knife out, “there’s always a way in.”

    Stan looked at the knife.  “What are you going to do?”

    I shrugged.  “Find a way in.  What are they going to do, arrest us?”

    Stan frowned.  “I don’t think that’s a good idea.”

    Andy was grinning.

    “For nostalgia’s sake?” I suggested.

    Stan shook his head.  “No.  Let’s get back.  It’s not important.”

    I raised my eyebrows, trying to look very Spockian, then shrugged and closed the knife.

    We wandered back to Van Hoosen.  Daryl was walking his computer down from Owen.

    “What are you doing?” Andy asked.

    Daryl gave us a frantic look.  “I can’t take it anymore!  I’m melting!  I can’t think!  I won’t stand for it, I tell you, I just won’t!”  Then he grinned.  “I’m setting up in Van Hoosen.”

    I faded away from them then and wandered back up to my monk’s hole.  The coolers, the wine, the walk—hell, I passed out.

    In the morning I woke up and sat on the edge of my bed staring at the coffeemaker that I had forgotten to set.  No coffee.  Shit.

    I splashed water on my face, then made coffee.

    A note had been slid under my door in the night.  Sleepily, I scooped it up and returned to the edge of the bed.  The coffeemaker gurgled energetically.  After a couple of minutes I turned on the stereo behind me.  Genesis came out.

    I opened the note.

    “Mark:  just wanted you to know, loved this story.  Your writing gets clearer and clearer.  Keep up the good work.  Kelley.  Ditto, Mark.  Nicola.  Me, too.  Glenda.  Chin up. Peg.”

    I sat there with a goofy grin—I could feel it, I know when I have a goofy grin—staring at that note.  In one note I went from maudlin to mushy.

    Later, in the workshop, they eviscerated that story.  Of course.  Being a friend means being honest.

    That was the other thing nobody told me about Clarion.

    new-fantasy-thugs.jpg

    New Fantasy Thugs, Clarion class of 1988:  l to r (roughly)  Lou Grinzo, Jay Brazier, Daryl Gregory, Kimberly Rufer-Bach,Kelly McClymer, Mark Tiedemann, Peg Kerr Ihinger, Brookes Caruthers, Sharon Wahl, Nicola Griffith, Kelley Eskridge, George Rufener, Glenda Loeffler, Sue Ellen Sloca, Mark Kehl, Andy Tisbert

  • Resume du jour

    It’s June.  A smidgen over a year ago (May 29th, 2009) Advance Photographics closed its doors and I have been unemployed since.

    In that time I have written half of the sequel to my alternate history novel, Orleans, and a complete new novel, a murder mystery called  The Drowned Doll.  I’ve written blog posts for both here and Dangerous Intersection and occasionally for my MySpace page (which is getting more and more neglected in favor of Facebook, through which I can stream this blog).  I wrote book reviews for a good chunk of 2009 until two of my review outlets basically dried up and went away.

    I’m also now, as I’ve mentioned before, beginning to learn Photoshop in a meaningful way and toying with entering the vast realm of full digital photography.

    Along with that I have continued to serve on the board of the Missouri Center for the Book and have become its president again as of this past March.  My life is nothing if not bubbling with activity.  None of which, however, is paying me a damn thing.

    We bought a new bed.  After nearly 30 years with a waterbed, age and comfort demand something else, so we replaced the king size freeflow with a high end Serta (queen  size) and have thereby also gained much floor space in the bedroom, something we’ve been chafing over the lack of for some time.

    Our stove finally died.  With a great brilliant spark, the control panel for the ancient monstrosity announced forced retirement, so we must now buy a new stove.  This is a mixed thing, both an occasion for celebration and a pain in the butt for the untimely expense.  We’re also getting some painting done.

    I had to repair the ceiling in my office.

    I am attempting to write a new short story.  I may have mentioned that some time in the last decade, since devoting myself almost entirely to novels, I’ve misplaced my ability to do them and now I wish to hunt that ability down and capture it again.  I have a deadline, which helps somewhat.

    Like so many today, my job prospects are dim.  What I spent 35 years doing is an obsolete skill (traditional, wet process photofinishing).  My admittedly impressive publishing oeuvre does not seem to impress people looking for editors or technical writers.  My academic credentials, being nonexistent, limit me in terms of getting interviews.  I am in a position wherein I must make my writing work.  I must.  I want to, there’s no question there, but with four completed novels currently unsold (due to factors of which I have no concept) and no ready ideas on how to move any of this forward, I’m in an awkward position.  As each of the novels currently in circulation are attached to series, all of them will entail sequels when they sell.  It would seem unwise for me to write yet another novel at this point.

    So.  I’m open to suggestions.  Right now I’m going to go to the gym.  Before I go, though, I thought I’d go ahead an post my resume.  Just in case anyone may read this who may be interested.

    Have a nice day.

    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Mark W. Tiedemann
    P.O. Box 160160 St. Louis, MO 63116
    mwtiedemann@earthlink.net
    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Strategic Planning                    Communications
    Organizational Development                Press Relations
    Public Affairs & Presentation                Public Speaking
    Staff Recruitment                    Workshop Management

    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Participated in the determination of organizational policies regarding issues of program requirements and benefits, as well as longterm goals.

    Organized public events, including speaker liaison, facilities, and scheduling.

    Established relationships with other agenices and organizations to facilitate common goals.

    Directed activities of professional and technical staff and volunteers.

    Spoken to community groups to explain organizational goals, policies, and programs.

    Recruited, interviewed, and hired or signed up volunteers and staff.

    Represented organizations in relations with governmental and media institutions.

    Prepared written presentations, including newsletter material, in support of organizational goals.

    Oversaw board meetings, setting agenda, and directing input from members to facilitate optimum productivity, and establishing policies consistent with the achievement of organizational goals.

    ____________________________________________________________________________________

    Published author since 1990.  Ten novels, fifty-five short stories in various national publications, book reviews, occasional articles.  Bibliography available on request.

    Missouri Center for the Book (http://books.missouri.org) .  Elected president in 2005, I have worked to revitalize the organization and have successfully increased its board membership, public visibility, and overseen the establishment of the new Poet Laureate position for the state of Missouri.  Prior to becoming president, I developed and produced a variety of public programs for the organization.

    Advance Photographics: 1997 to the present.  Duties include all aspects of traditional photofinishing, with an emphasis on b & w processing, color printing, and copy work.

    Self employed freelance writer: August 1995 to July 1997

    Shaw Camera Shop: December 1975 to July 1995.  Custom b & w photofinishing, all aspects, including lab manager from 1982 onward.