Category: Writing

  • Thinking, Thinking…

    I’m supposed to be reassessing this weekend.  Instead, I’ve being reading, cleaning house, being interviewed for a YouTube video…

    That was a bit surreal.  I have no idea how it will come out, but it will get some exposure (pun intended), and since we live in a highly visual time that might be better promotion than anything I actually write here.

    Still, it was amusing.  My interlocutor asked a few questions to set the general direction of my rants and let me go.  He intends to edit it down to digestible bits and put up one or two 10-minute segments on Dangerous Intersection.  Mark Tiedemann on History.  Mark Tiedemann on Religion.  Mark Tiedemann on Sex…

    I should also have been doing more writing this weekend.  Donna spent the night at her sister’s house, so I had the place pretty much to myself from about five on, and here it is seven in the morning and this is the first scribbling I’ve done.  I am such a lazy ass at times.

    Today is the Dante Group.  The penultimate canto in the Inferno.  We’ve moved through this in pretty good time.  Next weekend we’ll do the last canto and then wait till ’09 for Purgatory.  It has been instructive and I will probably, at some point, include some of what I’ve gleaned from Dante into my fiction.  I want to do another Quill story.  Quill is my pilgrim in search of meaning.  The only one of his pieces that has seen print is Chasing Sacrifice, published long ago in the pages of Science Fiction Age.  I’ve written one more since and it’s in submission now, but…

    For some reason I’ve always had trouble writing short fiction in series.  A couple decades back I tried it with a character called Mix Sentenni.  Street kid who manages to work his way into the space industry and pull himself up.  I managed to write three stories, one of them a reworking on an earlier version.  One made it into print in Space & Time, the second one got me into Clarion, and the third was an updated, completely revamped version of the first one and sold to Tales of the Unanticipated.  And that was it.  Never came up with another Mix story, although you’d think it would be a great vehicle for further examinations of that particular setting.  Imagination failed.

    Quill is my next attempt, but so far…I guess I’d be terrible writing a television show.

    The notion behind Quill is to explore religious questions in a space opera setting.  I decided to do them at novella length to see if that helped.  And as I say, I written two.  If I can do three more at that length I’d have enough for a decent fix-up novel.  But…

    I have a title for a third one and some ideas are churniung in my hindbrain.  We’ll see.  It would be nice.  But in this case, it’s also a matter of not wanting to grind axes on the page.  I want the stories to fall out naturally, not turn into polemic.  The Dante sessions are helping.

    In fact…

  • Accomplishments

    “What you do in this world is a matter of no consequence.  The question is, what can you make people believe that you have done?”  Sherlock Holmes, A Study In Scarlet

    Utterly cynical.

    And yet….

    I’ve been following the publishing industry meltdown this past couple of weeks.  It was bound to come, all consumer-related industries are going to be adversely affected by this nonsensical implosion.  I’ve been watchign and wondering what it might mean for… me.

    At this moment I have to admit to having no career.  Everything is tentative, all is on hold, I wait with baited breath (just what does that mean, I wonder?) to find out (eventually) if I’m ever going to sell anything again.

    And at the moment I’m not sure I care.

    Ten novels, fifty short stories.  That is a career.  What more can someone of modest skills and talents hope for?

    Today a friend is coming over to my house to do a video interview.  This will be an interesting experiment.  It could open possibilities, get my face and my voice out on the web, alert people to my presence beyond those things I have already done, and hopefully give me a little better shot at continuing on in what I decided 25 years ago that I wanted to do.

    I’m cleaning my office, a neverending task.  I’m stumbling across the detritus of untended chores, obligations, ideas, and possibilities.  Little scraps of paper with cryptic notes, phone numbers, email addresses, various numbers, single words, dates…

    Last night I watched George Carlin’s last HBO Special.  I’ll miss him.  I’m not quite as cynical or curmudgeonly as George was, certainly not as gifted in the ability to talk about certain things in such a humorous way.  I’ll miss him, his presence in the world.  I never knew him, but always with celebrity like that you have the feeling that you did know him.

    Afterward, a long talk with two friends, one who pointed out that I sounded depressed.  Not sad, not forelorn, not pessimistic—Depressed.  Maybe.  It’s hard to tell.  I bounce back, get excited, work on something.  I am working on something lately, as I’ve mentioned.  As long as the words keep coming out, some of them anyway, I don’t think I need to go to the doctor.  But I passed up going to the gym again this morning.  Too cold, too tired, too—

    Maybe 2009 will be better.  (I keep telling myself that, anyway.)  Anyway, I still have more cleaning to do.  I found the opening quote on an index card that it browned with age.  It meant something to me at one time and I think it still does.

    What does it mean to you?

  • Sibelius

    I love Sibelius. I find his themes, motifs, melodies absolutely immersing. He was touted once as the heir to Beethoven and while I think Dvorak rightly deserves that title, in the 20th Century it’s hard to beat Sibelius.

    I’m reading Alex Ross’s history of music in the 20th Century, The Rest Is Noise. It’s a fine book. Ross has a gift. Every once in a while I run across a piece of writing that is just begging to be shared. Today I read this, about the place where Sibelius lived.

    Ainola stands much as Sibelius left it. The atmosphere of the house is heavy and musty, as if the composer’s spirit were still pent up inside. But you get a different feeling when you walk into the forest that stretches out on one side of the house. The treetops meet in an endless curving canopy, tendrils of sunlight dangling down. The ground is uncluttered: many paths fork among the trunks. Venturing a little farther into the wood, you lose sight of all human habitation. A profound stillness descends. The light begins to fail, the mists roll in. After a while, you may begin to wonder if you will ever find your way back. Many times in Sibelius’s music the exaltation of natural sublimity gives way to inchoate fear, which has less to do with the outer landscape than with the inner one, the forest of the mind.

    Mm!

    And yes, you can certainly get that from the music. Especially the later symphonies. But I can talk about that another time. For now, I just wanted to share this piece of exceptional writing.

  • New Project

    This past weekend was productive.  I began work on the outline to my next novel.  I’ve been fiddling around with something since May, when I finished The Spanish Bride.  I was exhausted, burned out, just plain not interested.  I still seem to be caught in some kind of writer’s block about short stories, but I spun out nearly ten pages of single-spaced outline for the sequel to Orleans.  There is the slightly-better-than-remote possibility that Orleans could get picked up, and if so then I will nned to write the rest of the trilogy.

    Oculus will pick up pretty much where Orleans left off.  (Yes, the titles are all “O” titles, including the overall title of the trilogy, which is the Oxun Trilogy.  Oxun is the South American river goddess, the only female of the bunch that outwitted the boys and became just as if not more powerful than the others.  I’m using it as a metaphor rather than a plot device, but she just might turn up somewhere along the line anyway.)

    It feels good to be writing something again.  Other than grant proposals, blog posts, and assorted newsletter stuff.

    Couple of things I need that will be difficult to find.

    A substantial part of the background of these novels (alternate history) deals with Germaine de Stael.  Google her, quite a woman.  The only woman who ever frightened Napoleon.  But he wouldn’t have her just killed.  He exiled her, banished her, had his secret police at one point chase her all over Europe and into Russia…anyway, I became fascinated with her.  I’ve got her memoir about her exile, a book of her philosophical and political writings, a solid biography, etc.  As with most such projects, it is the most unlikely little details that can hang you up.

    Her father, Jacques Necker (google him, too—this family was important) at one point bought 38,000 acres in New York.  Germaine herself added to it and, according to the biography I have, “came to own a substantial part of upstate New York.  But of course I haven’t been able to pin her holdings down.  I probably could if I went to Albany and septn a weekend or more in their public records archive, etc.  I probably won’t do that.  I’ve looked at a map, I’ve seen what upstate New York contains, and just decided where her holdings would have been. Part of the action of the novel takes place in Saranac Lake and vicinity.  Lot of French town names around there.  Seems a safe bet.

    Anyway, it would be nice to know specifically where her holdings were.  If anyone reads this and has a way of finding this out, please email me at  info@marktiedemann.com

    A minor side issue to this.  There is a largish island in Upper Lake Saranac.  It’d be nice to know a little about it.  I’ll track some of this down eventually myself, but I thought I’d ask.

    I’ve been stewing in my own juices most of this year.  Time to get off my butt and write something new.  Stay tuned.

  • Why I Write

    From time to time someone asks me (as, no doubt, they ask other writers) why I do it.  Why, specifically, I write fiction as opposed to nonfiction.  It really is hard to explain to those who seem tone-deaf to what we call Art.  Sometimes it’s hard to explain to yourself.  The short answer for me is that I love it.  I love creating stories and weird stuff and making up plots, because I always loved stories.  (When I was a kid, I’d watch movies in which a group of people are thrust into a really cool adventure and at some point one of them would talk about wanting to just go home and having everything return to normal.  And, as a kid, I’d think why would you want to do that?  Can’t you see that what you’re doing now is so much cooler than going back to a dull life?  That was a kid talking, of course, because the stories were in fact so much cooler than what passed for my “real life.”  It’s only later that you realize that part of your “real” life was the freedom to indulge stories, pretend, and thrust yourself—quite safely—into adventures.)  Telling stories just felt like the coolest thing to do.

    But then you grow up and actually try to do it and if you stick with it long enough to discover all sorts of other aspects to it that you couldn’t imagine as a kid just looking for a neat ride.  And that’s the art.  And that is hard to describe to people who don’t read fiction, who don’t Get It.

    Dan Simmons wrote a novel called The Crook Factory about Ernest Hemingway in WWII.  He lived in Cuba then and he ran an amateur spy ring, hunting submarines, for a time.  This much is true.  Simmons built a very intricate and thrilling novel around it.  His viewpoint character, though, is a FBI agent who is one of those with the tin ear, who doesn’t Get It, why someone would write fiction.

    Late in the novel they have a conversation about it.  Here is part of it.

    “Why do you do it?”

    “Do what?

    “Write fiction rather than write about true things.”

    Hemingway shook his head.  “It’s hard to be a great writer, Lucas, if you love the world and living in it and you love special people.  It’s even harder when you love so many places.  You can’t just transcribe things from the outside in, that’s photography.  You have to do it the way Cezanne did, from inside yourself.  That’s art.  You have to do it from inside yourself.  Do you understand?”

    “No.”

    Hemingway sighed softly and nodded.  “It’s like listening to people,  LUcas.  If their experiences are vivid, they become a part of you, whether or not their stories are bullshit or not.  It doesn’t matter.  After a while, their experiences get to be more vivid than your own.  Then you mix it all together.  You invent from your own life stories and from all of theirs, and after a while it doesn’t matter which is which…what’s yours and what’s theirs, what was true and what was bullshit.  It’s all true then.  It’s the country you know, and the weather.  Everyone you know…the trick in fiction is like the trick in packing a boat just so without losing trim.  There are a thousand intangibles that have to be crammed into every sentence.  Most of it should not visible, just suggested…

    “Anyway, the…trick is to write truer than true.  And that’s why I write fiction rather than fact.”

    That’s one way to describe it.  I didn’t realize truth had anything to do with it until I read an Algis Budrys review of a Gene Wolfe novel.  He said of Wolfe that he told the truth well.  I puzzled over that for a time before it clicked.  I’d been saying something of the sort for a long time concerning philosophy—that there’s truth and then there’s fact.  Occasionally the two meet and become tangled up and are in many respects the same thing, but mostly there are facts, which have no meaning.  Truth is the meaning, which must be derived or extrapolated from fact.  Which led me to the conclusion that Truth is a process, an ongoing experience of recognition.  One of the places I’ve found it has been in good fiction.

    I don’t know if Hemingway ever actually said the above—it sounds like something he would have said, though, which makes it true, whether there is the fact of it or not.  And that is what fiction does.

  • Rio Bravo

    I had to go to Wal-Mart this past weekend.  I know, I know, big box store, destructive of small town America, yadda-yadda.  I hate them, but once a year we do a Wal-Mart run for all kinds of stuff that, frankly, just ain’t as cheap anywhere else—toilet paper, vitamins, tissue paper, day-to-day Stuff.

    Usually I go with Donna.  This time she was in Iowa and I did it solo.

    Since I was there anyway, I browsed the big stack of remainder DVDs they always have and I went a little bonkers.  I bought the first season of the original Robin Hood with Richard Greene.  I remember the show as a kid and loved it, so for $5.00, why not?  (A real stitch, too, to see all these young actors who later did so much better—a skinny Leo McKern was a real hoot!)

    Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, Shane, The Mask of Zorro… I’m filling gaps sort of.  But I came home and immediately watched Rio Bravo.  You know, the movie got made over at least twice, maybe three times.  The best remake was El Dorado, but the original has something about it that the rest lack.  I loved the soundtrack, the overamplified gunshots, the seriously deficient acting of Rickie Nelson.  It’s a real jumbled mess, you know.  Dean Martin’s performance was the best thing in the film and it’s actually really damn good.  Wayne was, well, John Wayne.

    There are two John Wayne movies from back then that I think showcased what the man could actually do.  I think he was such an icon that he really couldn’t be seen as anything else, so some of his performances were seriously underappreciated.  Anyone who thinks the man couldn’t act hasn’t seen The Searchers, which is a very disturbing movie and Wayne played a very disturbed character.  The other one was The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.  Wayne isn’t the main character.  Not quite a supporting role, but definitely part of an ensemble, and it really is a rather convincing, sometimes moving performance.  It’s very much about the waining (pardon the pun) of the macho guy of the West.  His character is tough, independent, building his life competently, laying plans, and being, in the larger scheme of things, a Good Man.  But he loses it all to the educated Easterner who shows up in the guise of Jimmy Stewart carrying a stack of law books.  Both men get a lesson in realities, but where the lesson destroys one, it makes the other, and it is anything but a simple formula western.

    (I suppose you could throw Red River in there as well, but then we could go down the list of great Wayne westerns that were just…well, pretty fine, actually.)
    Rio Bravo, though, is the pure stuff of early western myth.  It’s formula to the core, but Howard Hawks made it work like a well-tuned V-8.  The photography was terrific and this DVD had restored Technicolor print.  When Technicolor was good it was the best.  There were times, though, when it didn’t work very well, but that was the cinematographers’ fault.  Here it works.

    One thing, though—Angie Dickinson.  She got better, but she really wasn’t a very good actress.  Nice to look at though, and she actually held her own against Wayne, but…well, she got better.

    Wayne became a target in the Sixties and Seventies for people who were intolerant of any kind of unapologetic patriotism, and he did overdo the flagwaving.  It’s a shame, but it was a war of symbols.  When you talk to people who knew him, the public image was somewhat at odds with the man himself.  I spoke once with George Takei about him.  Takei was in The Green Berets with Wayne and, despite their differences politically, he had nothing but nice things to say about Wayne, who labeled him Captain Sulu from day one.  Takei said the rule on the set was No Politics.  It was a smooth, cordial set, and Wayne was responsible for keeping the latent heat at a manageable level, an impressive feat given the subject of the film and time it was being made.

    Wayne avoided military service in WWII because he had a family.  I don’t know exactly how that worked—lots of men with families went—but he somehow made the argument that his presence in films would be more beneficial than his presence on a battlefield.  Depending on how you look at it, he was right.  It raises the question of how authentic one needs to be to espouse patriotic feeling.  Did Waynes later flagwaving require that he make the ultimate sacrifice, or could he be a patriot without needing to wear a uniform?  He put on a television special in the late Sixties about America.  It was a bombastic jeremiad about how wonderful the country is.  He did, however, get a lot of interesting people on it, like Robert Culp, who was very much an anti-war protestor at the time.  Thinking back on it now, I realize that at no point in it did he advocate going to Vietnam.  He never said that to be a Good American one had to put on a uniform and pick up a gun.  He just pushed the idea that the country was worth loving.

    His last film, The Shootist, was a sad one.  He went out in a blaze of gunfire, taking out a number of old enemies in one last shoot-out.  It can be read as an unapologetic, last hurrah for the way of the gun.  But it was also an admission that times had changed and he was dying, and the fitting end to his life would be to die as he lived.  A little over the top, that, but in its way bravely tragic.  After seeing it, one could go back over a long body of work to see elements of that tragic admission that this was all over.  And probably just as well.  Nathan rescued Lucy from the Indians, brought her home, and then had to leave.  He didn’t belong anymore.

    Wayne was one of the first and for a long time the only Big Name Star who allowed himself to be killed on screen.  I don’t know if that was his idea or if he just accepted it as a necessary part of good storytelling.  But there are many Wayne movies wherein the “hero” must leave, because the violence necessary to resolve the conflict makes him unsuitable for the world he has just made safe.  I think that gets overlooked a lot.  Too much.

  • My Books

    They say things never really disappear on the internet and I suppose that’s true if you have the patience to search.  For instance, here’s a link to my old website’s book page.

  • Celebration

    Come do this if you can:

    Poetry and Truth

    You’ll be glad you did.

  • Appearances Etc

    I have been remiss.  I ought to be posting the things I’m doing publicly here (among other places) and it’s been just crazy enough that I keep forgetting to do this.  One of the reasons I need a publicist.  But that will have to wait till I have something new to publicize, like a book coming out or something writerly like that.

    Meanwhile, I am doing things folks might be interested in.  So.

    October 25th I will be at Stephens College in Columbia, Missouri, for the Columbia Chapter of the Missouri Writers Guild annual conference. I will be the keynote speaker, plus I will be conducting a session on making the change from science fiction to historical writing.

    On November 8th, the Missouri Center for the Book will be relaunching its annual Celebrations.  Again at Stephens College in Columbia.  There will be a link to the event as soon as it information is up on the web.I will be there with the rest of our board to conduct a day-long conference on Truth and Poetry.

    Later in November will be a brand new event the MCB is co-sponsoring, which I am very excited about, with Cinema St. Louis and the St. Louis International Film Festival.

    This will be a presentation of the film King of the Hill, which was based on the A.E. Hotchener memoir.  We’ll show the film, then have a panel discussion on the translation of book to film.  The producer will be there, people from the Missouri Historical Society, etc.  Go to the link and scroll down for the details (then view the rest of the SLIFF schedule; this is a very cool festival).  Our date is November 22nd.

    Anyway, that’s what is happening relative to my schedule.  Still no word on a new book contract or anything like that, but fingers and toes are crossed (and recrossed) and hopefully something will break soon.

    Yesterday was my birthday, a day I normally ignore.  Other people remember it for me, however, so I get reminded that I’ve gone through another year without being rich or famous.  But I am not bored.

  • Smart Novels

    Recently I had a conversation with a friend who told me about the latest rejection of her novel (by an agent). There was nothing but praise from the agent, but ultimately the verdict came down to “This book is just too smart to sell.”

    Much scratching of head and muttered curses ensued and I sympathized. I’ve read the book in question and it is indeed a smart book. Very smart. It’s one of the rare examples of a novel that, from time to time, we hear about from an author in his or her cups complaining of being ignored by the publishing industry with the final dismissal of “Well, I’m just too good for them.” The natural reaction to this is an unspoken “Yeah, right” and then move on to the next subject.

    But I’ve come to believe that in a few instances, this is exactly true.

    Agent and publisher have one problem in common—how to sell a book. The agent must sell it to the publisher who must sell it to you, the general public. In pursuit of this, much time and skull sweat is spent trying to figure out—to divine—what will sell. It’s nigh unto an impossible task and usually the publisher puts work out, crosses collective fingers, and hopes for the best.

    Except in some instances where they are convinced they have a Winner and then extra effort is put into the book—sales-wise. A campaign is mounted. There is advertising. Reviews are purchased (yes, Virginia, reviews can be bought). An author tour is undertaken and underwritten. Radio interviews, and if things look especially good some local television. Attempts are made to transform the author into a Personality.

    Certain sometimes vague common denominators about such a book must be in place, however. The all-elusive Accessibility about sums it up. It must be popular, which means that readers with a reading ability of about the eighth-grade must be appealed to. (Perhaps I exaggerate a little, but just look at best sellers and the level of writing they exhibit. Never mind subject matter, that’s not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about vocabulary and depth.)

    Which brings me to my point. Some novels may well be considered “too good” for the publishing mills. And by that I mean they require something from the reader. They demand a bit more attention, a bit more commitment, a bit more general background education. They require that the reader step up to the plate prepared to participate in the reading experience at a level approaching that which the writer had in writing it. They elicit a projicient extrospective perspicacity on the part of the reader equal if not superior to the proffered text.

    In short, you might have to do a little work to really enjoy the book.

    Granted, some novels are abstruse to the point of diminishing returns (Finnegan’s Wake, Moderan) while others hide their cleverness beneath prose so under-challenging that whatever message may have been there is overlooked (most Kurt Vonnegut, in my most humble opinion, but The Old Man and the Sea certainly).

    We have a legacy of smart novels from the age when The Novel was the chief entertainment of a book buying class that possessed both vocabulary and philosophical depth. Which is why today we still find exceptional work published.

    But seldom from new writers.

    Don’t get me wrong, I am not for a moment condeming any new writers. Excellent work comes out all the time from new writers. But there is a level of intellectual conformism in style and approach that makes the rare “smart” novel something of an oddity. For every Donna Tartt, how many Ken Folletts get published? For every Matt Ruff or John Crowley, how many Dan Simmons or Jasper Ffordes get published. For every Guy Davenport, Umberto Eco….

    Anyway, this is not to slam any writer who produces good work that is in some way “safe” by virtue of being accessible. Nor is it to say that the novels of which I speak don’t ever get published. Obviously they do. Sometimes you have to find them from obscure little publishers tucked off in the corner of East Erudite or some such, or they get lucky enough to find a smart imprint within a larger consortium.

    But how often do they sell well? How often are they really promoted? And how many rejections do they garner before finding a Believer who takes the chance?

    These are books that do not compromise. Now, no writer intentionally compromises, and this is really not about the writer anyway. What it is about is a mindset in the publishing industry that would bar a Thomas Pynchon if he came on the scene brand new today because no one would know “how to market it.” I’m talking about an attitude on the part of the gatekeepers that predetermines what would be “too smart” for the reading public.

    Which all comes down to the ledger. What is being said is not that the book isn’t worth publishing, but that the publisher can only conceive of a small audience for it, which makes it not worth while.

    Or some such nonsense.

    Smart novels that get readily snapped up, it seems to me, wear a cloak of something else that the publisher recognizes as salable. Something that can be reduced to a one-line sales pitch. This may be how a lot of smart writers get themselves to the point where they can start writing that wholly unclassifiable, “too good to be published” work that is their true forte (consider William Gibson). Michael Chabon is doing interesting, unclassifiable work (smart work) now, but his first couple of novels, while smart on one level, wore an overcoat of relative conventionality (Mysteries of Pittsburgh, Wonderboys). He makes money now, he can publish what he wants.

    Finally, though, this is a cop-out. The agent (or publisher) is basically admitting to a lack of imagination or energy or both. What they’re saying is that, in the market as it exists today, it would be too damn much effort for them to sell this book, because, well, it is clearly good, it is clearly worthy, but it is also clearly over the heads of the sales department. It is a confession of surrender to the fact that The Market has beaten them into submission with its apparent demands for more of the same pabulum that fills supermarket book shelves. (You’d never see William Gaddis shelved in the local QuickMart next to John Grisham.)

    So next time you hear the phrase “my novel was too good for them”—pause. One or two percent of those people may be telling the unadorned truth. They might actually be someone with something worth reading.

    But only one or two percent.

    I’d be perfectly happy to be convinced that this is not really the case. In fact, I do believe that if the writer perseveres, eventually good work gets published. But the playing field is anything but level.