Author: Mark Tiedemann

  • ConText

    Returned home yesterday, around two P.M.  Scads of emails in the hopper, mail in the box, laundry to do, a dog to pet.

    I had a good time at ConText.  The Doubletree where it was held was in a a kind of commercial court with several good restaurants and a multiplex movie theater (which I did not go to).  It was a smallish con with some good guests (Toby Buckell, Lucy Snyder, Paul Melko) and a decent program track.  More about the books than many cons with which I’ve become familiar, which is refreshing.

    Diana Dru Botsford, who serves on the Missouri Center for the Book with me, was able to premier her first novel at the convention.  Four Dragons, a Stargate SG-1 novel.  Watching her, I was envious.  The excitement of having your first novel out is unlike anything else.

    I was able to link up with my good friend Tim Esaias.  He taught workshops almost all weekend, so we didn’t visit as much as I’d liked, but it’s always good to see Tim.  We now have something that I do not believe previously existed—a picture together.

    tim-me.jpg

    I’ve known Tim now for…23 years, I suppose.  He very early on encouraged me to continue writing.  He’s been a solid critic, a good editor, and a terrific friend.  He’s teaching now himself, at Seton Hill in Pennsylvania.  Diana was one of his students.

    Tim is one of the Good Ones.  Those who know him understand what I mean.  Occasionally such people should be acknowledged.  Tim helped me.  Effectively.

    Enough of that, now.  Time to go back to work.

  • Conventioning

    In a couple of days I’ll be heading for Columbus, to attend ConText.  My first time at this convention and it’s long overdue.  I should have gone years ago.  I attended another convention in Columbus once, at the suggestion of my then-publisher who had been invited as a publisher GoH.  When we got there we realized that it was the wrong con for a book release party, which was what he had in mind.  It was almost entirely a media con.

    Leafing through the program book I came across an ad for ConText, with the tagline:

    “The convention for those of us who actually read the stuff.”

    Oops.  Now I’ll make up for my negligence, even those this is not a great time for me to be going to conventions.  I have nothing coming out, no books at least, and it’s been some time since my last one.  (Yes, I’m working on it, I’m working on it.)

    But this should be fun.  One of my best friends is conducting a couple of workshops, as is a newer friend, and there are a couple of people there whom I’d like to meet and some others I haven’t seen in some time.  We long ago started using conventions to keep up with friends.

    This will be the beginning of a long fall of events.  A lot of stuff happening.

    End of this month, MadCon 2010.  The week after that, Archon.  The week after that, The Big Read (here, in Clayton, MO).  On the 23rd, the Celebration of the Book.

    As to that last, please consider attending.  We’re doing a smaller one this year, but 2011 ought to be considerably larger.  But we need to start building this up.  The registration form is here.  I’ll be blogging more about this as the time nears.

    For now, I must clean house, choose clothes, brush up on my social skills (such as they are).  I’ll say something about how it went when I return next week.

  • More Playing With Pictures

    I had to call a friend to help me set up to scan slides.  It was literally a matter of not having something plugged it.  No, I don’t mind admitting “Doh!” moments.  Learning is filled with them, embarrassment shouldn’t prevent sharing of knowledge.

    Anyway, the scanner works for color transparencies now and I have a mother butt load of them in the closet.  Thousands upon thousands.  At least half of them are Kodachrome.

    So I began with a couple on hand and started playing.  One I did this morning I have worked up into two versions.  Here’s the first.

    merry-go-still-1.jpg

    Yes, I said and you read correctly that this is from a COLOR transparency.  But it was shot late in the day and was pretty monochromatic, all browns and yellows and hints of red.  I thought it would make a better black & white image and it is pretty dramatic.  (I just desaturated it in Photoshop, played with the contrast, etc.)

    But I thought it had a bit more potential.  A photographer I used to admire was Pete Turner, who developed a style of intensely monochromatic images often with one variant color.  I always liked the idea, but the best I could do from what I worked with (unless I lucked into a shot that was basically all one color) was to hand tint black & white images.

    Well, Photoshop allows me to indulge it and do it a bit better.  Hence—

    merry-go-round-2-copy.jpg

    This is now my preferred version.  I isolated the two brightly color areas, oversaturated them, and then drew down the saturation over all.  I didn’t quite manage it right to get a completely black & white overall image, but this has some charm I quite like.

    Anyway, both images will appear in my Zenfolio portfolio.  A fun morning’s work.

    Enjoy the weekend.

  • Hitch

    As I mentioned in my previous post, Christopher Hitchens has esophageal cancer.  He is undergoing chemotherapy.  His prognosis is not good, as this is a particularly nasty form of cancer with a low survival rate.

    It turns out that many people are praying for his recovery, which I find ironic but wonderful.  This is, I’ve been told, what true christianity is supposed to be like—extending the benevolence of your faith to those who might qualify as an enemy.  If only all christians were like that.  If only those who are like that were the loudest voices.

    Unfortunately, the screaming meme misanthropic anti-intellectual pre-Enlightenment ignoramus branch of the movement tends to dominate a lot of the discourse, from the supporters of Proposition 8 to those who are not only praying for Hitch to die, but are sending notice of such prayers to public fora and putting megaphone to mouth so as many people as they can blast with their message will hear.

    I will let Jeffrey Goldberg, correspondent for The Atlantic, express it for me.  He summed my feelings up quite nicely here.

    I know many christians who find their uncouth brethren-in-name an embarrassment.  When they say that “we’re not all like that” they tell the truth.  It is my personal opinion that they would “not be like that” whether they believed in god or nothing, that decency has no denomination and requires no supernatural support mechanism.  I agree with the sentiments of people like Hitch and Richard Dawkins that by and large most people are secular, both in their outlook and their morality, that what is considered good and decent behavior today and what is considered unsupportable have changed over time and it is the pressure of evolving cultural demands, not any new revelation, that has had the most positive effect.  The Enlightenment, wherein many if not all of the ideas of equality and human dignity and the motives for social justice and progress came into their own, was a para-religious movement, sometimes a-religious, occasionally anti-religious.  We do not, most of us, live according to biblical precepts and rules nor would we find it acceptable to do so.

    Whatever the reality, Hitch has argued that history is littered with the bodies of religion’s victims, and while it is legitimate to say that those who performed the atrocities did so outside the proper moral ground of religious feeling, it is also legitimate to argue that they in fact found justification for their actions in those same feelings and in the writings of their various faiths.

    Hitch has spoken positively about Jesus the man and has argued that whoever he was, he was ahead of his time, a great teacher, and laid down a program those who have claimed for two millennia to be his followers have in aggregate failed to live up to.  Those who are praying for Hitch to recover, to be well, are, in this moment, succeeding.  They should deny those who pray for his death the use of the sobriquet Christian.  Not in that they are not living up to the expectations of their faith—in their eyes they are—but in that they have failed to see how their faith has severed them from legitimate moral feeling.

    I do not pray.  But I wish Hitch well.  And for all those believers praying on his behalf—I wish you all well, too.

  • A Week’s Worth of Stuff

    This past week some things have moved forward which please me.  The Missouri Center for the Book is about it have a new Facebook page.  I made the decision to put it up now, in advance of the total website make-over, because I think it will be necessary to get the upcoming Celebration promoted more efficiently.  That event will be October 23rd, again in Columbia.  Barring other avenues of advertising, I think this one will be essential.

    It’s happening.  Also, the new website design is coming along quickly and when that is up there will be regular blog posts, and a special section from the state poet laureate.  When that happens, obviously, I’ll post about it here.

    On a personal front, I’ve gotten the preliminary schedule from Context in Columbus OH and they’ve put me on at least three panels and given me a kaffeeklatsch.  The latter will be interesting.  I’ve done a couple of these, but with less than amazing results.  One of these days I hope to have a dozen people show up and make me feel like a real honest-to-goodness writer type person.  But the panels look interesting.

    More short fiction.  I am forcing the hindbrain to put out.  I will do more short stories.  I’m coming to grips with an old one that almost didn’t work but now seems to be moving along nicely.

    I went to the gym Friday and had a decent work-out (650 lbs on the leg press, not too shabby for an old man) but I’m feeling a bit drained today, so I’m putting off going back till tomorrow or Tuesday.

    Although many things are still in limbo, curiously I’ve been feeling good about things this past week, like everything will work out fine.  I am not given to groundless optimism or airy prognostications.  “Oh, it will all come out fine, you’ll see,” is not a working philosophy for me.  But you can only control so much on your own.  You can do the best you can with what you have in hand and if the next step depends on Other People, well, you can’t let their lethargy, inertia, or recalcitrance depress you.  It does depress you, because, well, if they don’t do X, Y, or Z then what you want to do doesn’t move forward, but there’s not much you can do about that short of going to them personally and being persuasive.  Like that would work.

    So you shift gears and work on something else.  You enjoy a good meal.  Watch a movie, read a book, contemplate the heavens…

    cloud.jpg

    In my case, the physical heavens, as the supernatural variety holds no charm for me.

    Having said that, I note that Christopher Hitchens, earnest, sharp, intellectually stimulating transplanted Brit who lectures and debates on atheism among other things, is in dire straits.  He was diagnosed recently with esophageal cancer, a nasty form that has a low survival rate.  His father apparently died of it.  I saw him recently on an interview with Anderson Cooper and most of his hair is already gone from the chemo, but he was quite stoic and lucid.  He was asked about the possibility of a death-bed conversion and he said emphatically that as long as he was himself, no, but there’s no guarantee that he won’t be someone else if he’s too far gone in pain and medication.

    Life is what it is.  I know intellectually that it isn’t fair.  It isn’t anything pro or con in terms of justice or equality or anything else.  It is what it is.  Fairness is a concept of our invention that we bring to the enterprise.  But because it’s ours, we tend to invest it with merit and get angry when things don’t go according to an expectation we impose.

    Still, I wish him well and will regret his death.  He fearlessly pokes into the dark corners and writes about what he finds and people like that are worth more than can be assessed.

    Another mixed bag of a week, then.  Can’t wait to see what next week has in store.

  • Photography and Change

    Steve McCurry, a famous photographer whose image of an Afghan girl with brilliant green eyes for National Geographic has become iconic, has been given a great and sad gig—Kodak has handed him the last production roll of Kodachrome to take and shoot.  He’s doing it in grand style, traveling all over the world, with a film crew shooting a documentary about it.

    I wanted to be a photographer for National Geographic when I was a teenager.  I knew nothing about how to do that, and for numerous reasons I won’t go into I never found out or took the chance.  I played it safe with a nice steady lab job and didn’t pursue a dream.  Oh well.

    But I have nevertheless made some images of which I am very proud.  Here’s one:

    cedar-in-canyon-copy.jpg

    I just finished Photoshopping this and doing some work on it to make it more what I wanted it to be.  There are reasons for the abandonment of film, yet I feel sad.  Kodachrome had a special look and it was for a long time my favorite film.  The idea that Kodak won’t be making it anymore—or any of its other films—is just too weird to me.  I remember when they purged their paper line.  They once made dozens of types of photographic paper (b & w) in a variety of surfaces and in the mid to late 70s they discontinued 90% of them.  The market was changing, resin coated paper was becoming popular, sales flagged on the harder-to-use fibre papers…

    Still, it’s a loss.  I will be very interested to see what Mr. McCurry does with that final roll.  Meantime, like most of the rest of us, I’m learning to do this digitally.

    Gotta say, it has possibilities for me that are very seductive.

    canyon-swirls-copy.jpg

    Both images were shot in New Mexico.

  • New Fiction

    I’ve been working this past few months on short fiction.  You wouldn’t think this would be such a hard thing to do, given my rate of production in the last ten years (almost fifteen novels, scores of book reviews, a few assorted nonfiction pieces, and all the blog entries, both here and on Dangerous Intersection), but short fiction is peculiar.  Hell, anything is peculiar.  If you’re used to writing one form, switching to another can be very difficult.  There are some writers, I know (and some I know) who have no trouble moving between forms, but for whatever reason I do.

    I feel as though some time in the last several years I’ve forgotten how to write a short story.

    So after completing my last novel (the murder mystery) I opted to go back to short fiction.  I finished The Drowned Doll in late March.  Here it is nigh unto to the end of July and finally I’m doing short stories.

    Last month I finished a story for Lee Martindale for an anthology she’s editing, got it in the mail, and she took it.  Amazing what a sale will do for your spirits.  This past week I finished the rough draft of a novelette and this morning I have begun another new story.

    These last two are interesting in that I have no idea where they came from.  Writers get asked with such numbing regularity “Where do you get your ideas?” that it seems to me occasionally I should print up small cards with the various answers to hand out.  There is only one true answer—I have no idea!

    Once in a while I can trace the germ of a story back to a couple of sources—an overheard comment, an article, something on television or the radio—and in the case of anthologies, it’s a bit simpler.  The anthology is about X, ergo the story will be about X.  The unique feature will be the way it’s about X, and that’s the whole point.  The real guts of a story is in the execution, the approach, the viewpoint.  Ideas are easy—so easy we often don’t even know we’ve had them until we start writing the story.

    What you do with your ideas is where the action is, and that’s where the work comes in.  That’s why when someone approaches us and says “Hey, I’ve got a great idea for a novel.  I’ll tell you what it is, you write it, we’ll make a fortune” we usually laugh.  Thanks.  Got plenty of ideas, friend.  What is required is lots and lots of hard work!  You do half the sweating, you get half the money.

    Case in point is the story I just finished and the one I just started.  In both instances, all I had was a title.  The title of the completed one was a phrase I jotted down at the Dante reading group we attend.  It just sounded cool.  So a couple weeks ago, I sat my butt in my chair, opened a new file, typed in the header, and put the title up.

    And stared at it.

    About an hour of that and I came up with a first sentence.  That sentence had the seed of the rest of the tale.  I just started writing.  With a few pages I had the basic concept fleshed out.  I laughed, too, because I still have no idea where this idea came from.

    Now, it’s a first draft and I already know it won’t survive the rewrite.  But I needed to get this stuff down and out of the way before I could get to the meaty stuff.

    So while Donna goes over it with her vicious red pen, I decided to write another new one.

    Again, I opened a file, put all the top matter in, and typed a title:  Decadence.  (I know where that came from, there’s a copy of Jacques Barzun’s Dawn To Decadence right in front of me.)  Okay, catchy title.  Now what?  There’s a lot to say about that subject, a lot has been said.  I want to write a science fiction story below that title.

    Stare at the screen.

    Hell with it, walk the dog.  We did almost two miles this morning.

    And I sat down and wrote the first sentence:  Lew heard them talking.

    I know what the story will be now.  I just have to build it.  (No, I won’t tell you what it is, you’ll just have to wait.)  But I couldn’t tell you where it came from.  There are galaxies of loose-floating factoids in my brain and when I require them to they collide, join, recombine, coalesce.  Sounds mysterious and miraculous, doesn’t it?  Again, though, it’s sweat.  I work hard to gather all those bits so that when I do need to come up with a story there are plenty of them available to at least start.

    If I finish this one, I’ll start to feel a bit better about my program to recover my short story skills.  It’s always a work in progress, a construction project.

    construction-remains.jpg

    So, on now to the task.

  • Interview Complete

    Over on Dangerous Intersection, all of my interview has been posted.  It’s up in three separate posts, seven parts altogether.  The links to each post are here:

    http://dangerousintersection.org/2010/07/18/mark-tiedemann-speaks/

    http://dangerousintersection.org/2010/07/19/mark-tiedemann-interview-parts-iv-and-v/

     http://dangerousintersection.org/2010/07/21/mark-tiedemann-wraps-up/

    Watching them now leaves me with mixed feelings.  This was almost a year-and-a-half ago.  The entire thing was done in the most casual way.  Erich had a few primer questions and then he just let me ramble.  There are bits I’d say differently now, but in essence not much would I change.  A couple of points are less clear than I’d like—the question about whether we are a “christian nation” is not answered as well as I would have preferred (Are we a christian nation?  No.  Are we a nation of christians?  Largely.  I wanted to make it clear that the secular nature of what the Founders established is so for a very, very good reason) but I think the idea gets across.

    This is eerie in many ways.  It’s like watching someone else who happens to look and sound like me and, yeah, I agree with the guy.

    Anyway, I am very happy to have been given the chance to do this.  I hope people who check them out are entertained if nothing else.

  • A Moment of Celebrity Type Stuff

    A friend of mine, the estimable Erich Veith, came by my home a bit over a year ago and we recorded a long interview.  Erich has finally gotten around to editing it and has begun posting segments on YouTube.  Here’s the first one.  (I still haven’t figured out how to embed videos here, so bear with me.)

    Erich runs the website  Dangerous Intersection, where I post opinionated blatherings from time to time and Erich graciously allows me to hold forth in my own idiosyncratic manner.  Why he thought people would also enjoy watching and hearing me as well, I can’t say, but I enjoyed the process and from the looks of the first three (which are up at Dangerous Intersection) I don’t think I came off too badly.

    The one thing that has puzzled me about Erich these past few years is, where does he find the time to do what he does?  I mean, he’s a lawyer, for one thing.  He has two daughters his wife and he are raising.  He’s a musician who occasionally gigs.  And he runs this website, which is quite large and has a lot of traffic, and would seem to me to be just a lot of damn work.  If you haven’t spent some time there, do.  In my experience it’s unique and I’ve enjoyed being a small part of it.

    My thanks to Erich for the opportunity to play at celebrity just a wee bit.  I hope others enjoy the results.

  • Radio Markets and Discontent

    Personal gripe time.  This is one of those instances where I believe The Market is a hydrocephalic moron and people who put their undying faith in get what they deserve.

    Shortly after the 4th of July just past, a St. Louis radio station changed hands.  KFUO 99.1 FM had, for sixty-plus years, been our commercial classical station.  Before the first Gulf War, our local NPR affiliate, KWMU, was largely a classical music broadcaster, but after that first foray into Mid east adventurism they became pretty much All Talk All Day.  Mind you, I like some of what they offer—Fresh Air, Talk of the Nation, Diane Rheem—but I am a lover of music.  My youth, in regards to radio, was all about music.  I cannot tolerate most of Talk Radio, especially the right wing stuff, but I’m not overly fond of the left wing blatherings, either.  Give me a good solid news show twice a day and then fill the airwaves with music.

    This has become a subject of nostalgia for me, because for the most part the music scene on radio has devolved into mind-numbing banality and repetition.  Catering to The Market has the net result of leavening out at the lowest common denominator, so instead of fascinating, new, or just first-rate music, we get the cuts that will appeal to the greatest number of whatever demographic a given station thinks it’s playing to.

    After KWMU went All Talk, little by little I began listening to KFUO.  They did not do as good a job, overall, as KWMU—I am a firm believer in airing complete works, so when I am offered A Movement of a symphony or what have you I am turned off; I want the whole damn thing or don’t bother (this is also true of other genres as well: I once got into a shouting match with a DJ over his insistence of playing the three-minute version of an Emerson, Lake & Palmer track that, in its fullness, ran to twelve minutes, and he demanded to know who wanted to listen to all that synthesizer soloing, to which I replied “people who like ELP, you moron!”  Needless to say, I lost that one, but I resent the whole assumption that the attention span of people will never exceed five minutes—if you assume that and that’s all you give them, you train them to have short attention spans)—but it was classical music, and I find myself, aging that I am, more and more indulging in that genre (if genre it is) out of sheer boredom and impatience with most other forms.  At least, on the radio.

    So KFUO became my car station.  (At home I listen to albums.  I would eliminate DJs and commercials if I could.  Playing my own discs, I can.)

    Due to the demands of The Market, the impatience of shareholders, etc etc, management at KFUO—the Lutheran Church, basically—sold the station.  It is now Joy 99, playing contemporary Christian pop…stuff.

    I’ve attempted to listen to some of it, but I find it unremittingly boring.  And I am pissed.  Where can I now go on the radio to get classical music?  Well, KWMU has taken advantage of the new high definition broadcast tech to split itself into multiple channels and has one dedicated to classical music.  But I can’t get that in the car.  Can’t get it at home on my stereo, either, unless I buy new equipment, which is a source of resentment as well.  We live in an age where if one does not have the latest, most up-to-date Thingie, at a cost of X hundred dollars per widget, one cannot partake of the goodies available—and the media changes often enough that buying new Thingies is now every couple, three years.

    Pardon my expression—Fuck That!  This is the Microsoft model taken to extremes.  It is a form of class division, based on tech-savvy and money.  You don’t have to pass laws to keep the so-called Unwashed out of the Club, you just have to make sure they can’t afford the newest Thingie.

    Ahem.  Excuse me, that was paranoid of me.  I have no reason to believe this is intentional.  This is The Market, in all its lobotomized asininity.

    Back for a moment to the new KFUO.  It is boring.  (I am beginning to recognize a pattern.  Christian pop sounds somewhat-to-mainly Country.  The southern lilt to the vocals, the excessively forced emotional warbling, twisting notes through laryngeal gymnastics for no reason other than to make use of a single chord for a few moments longer.  Never mind the lyrics—I didn’t have a problem with groups like Creed, at least not initially: the music was interesting, the lyrics showed a modicum of ingenuity—just the American Idol approach to hyped emotionalism as substitute for actual content.  But I really cannot abide dull music.  Even when, initially, this stuff sounds like they’re getting down with some passion, it’s really just arrangement and playing with the compression.  The simplest chords, the over-reliance on melody—almost always in major keys—and the de-emphasizing of anything that might distract from the primary message of the lyric content.  Now, KFUO, having been a Lutheran station, played a great deal of sacred music.  Most of which was GLORIOUS.  Beautiful, sonorous, majestic, interesting!  Composed by musicians who saw no reason to muffle their strengths, but put what they had into such compositions because the music itself was a form of worship, an offering to what they believed, honest and unhampered passion.  Modern Christian rock seems to do everything it can to apologize for being rock.  Of course, there’s a reason for this, since a good deal of what these folks espouse is a typical American attitude that sensuality is an enemy to faith, and let’s face it, rock is all about sensuality.  So, too, is jazz, perhaps even more so, which may be why one hears almost no Christian jazz.)  Boring is inexcusable, I don’t care what cause it is in the name of.

    Somehow some one or more “consultant” companies told the new owners that this will attract a larger market share than what KFUO had been doing.  For all I know, they’re right.  I have little faith in the taste of the masses, as a mass.  Most of the people I have ever known as casual acquaintances have exhibited appalling taste in the arts.  You have to be aware to be sensitive to nuance, to passion, to genuine merit, and it seems that most people move through life barely conscious of their surroundings.

    (I once had the most frustrating interchange with a woman at a party who kept complaining that everything I was putting on the stereo was “depressing.”  Her word.  Depressing.  What was I playing?  Flim and the BBs, Grover Washington, McCoy Tyner, things like that.  I couldn’t figure it out until she demanded, somewhat drunkenly,”Where’s the singing?”  Unless there was singing, it was depressing.  Of course, by singing she didn’t mean opera, she meant anything she could sing along to.  This was more music as sport than art.)

    So after a couple of weeks of listening the all this strained pseudo-music sung by earnest C & W types against the most singularly undifferentiated backgrounds, I am officially peeved.    I’d like my classical music back, please.  I don’t care about demographics.  There are dozens of other stations where one can hear similarly banal  excrescence, albeit possibly without the juvenile nonsense worship lyrics.  KFUO served an audience that is now not served at all, and I can’t help wondering if this is at least partly propagandistic.  That this is as much an effort to force a single voice onto the airwaves, driving out the specialist, minority voices, as it is to maximize returns on investment.

    Of course, that would be a bit paranoid, wouldn’t it?

    Except that over forty years of listening to radio I can’t help but notice that every instance of a station or a show that reached a bit higher, took a chance on quality, played the unexpected or occasionally controversial—all those stations were, one by one, taken over and dragged back down into the stew pot of “popular taste” at expense of anything genuinely challenging or interesting.  Regardless of genre.  Mediocrity is the hallmark of the largest market share.

    Have a good weekend.